Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote on 04/11/2016
04:28:11 PM:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:33:10PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > If the intent is to get rid of the priv field, I am not sure
whether we
> > can solve the problem this way.
>
> We are not 'getting rid' of priv, the desire is to replace chip->priv
with
> dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev), which is more consistent with the core
driver
> model.
>
> > You may remember that the vtpm proxy driver only registers the chip
> > once startup and retrieval of durations and timeouts successfully
>
> Doesn't matter, just dev_set_drvdata right after the chip is
> allocated, just like vtpm does already for chip->priv.
We don't have a dev at this point.
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
