On 08/19/2016 01:29 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:09:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
>> 1. Does TCG have a standard for this I2C binding in a DT like they have
>> for ACPI?
>> 2. Can I expect that the binding has the same fields with the same names
>> in some other platform that POWER? For example, what if there was an
>> ARM based platform. Would the same binding work there?
>>
>> I'm looking for document or something where you got your information.
>> Right now your code is based on nothing from my point of view.
>
> There is no real standards body for device tree right now.
>
> Submitting a Docuemtation patch to the device tree maintainers is the
> best we have today, and we as the TPM community should review it to
> ensure it makes sense from our perspective.
>
> Other DT platforms like ARM will use the bindings defined in
> Documentation/DeviceTree.
>
> Jason
Thanks, Jarkko, for stating exactly what is required to review the
patch. I will be providing the TPM Device Tree Documentation in my
patchset as per Jason's suggestion. We'll also be updating the PAPR to
document the new node.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
