On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:51PM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 29. August 2016 23:36:31 GMT-07:00, schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen 
> <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>:
> >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:44:37AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> >> This is documenting device tree binding for
> >> I2C based TPM, similar concept which being used
> >> for virtual TPM on POWER7 and POWER8 systems running PowerVM.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-tpm.txt | 29
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-tpm.txt
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-tpm.txt
> >b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-tpm.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..8fdee14
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-tpm.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> >> +Device Tree Bindings for I2C based Trusted Platform Module(TPM)
> >> +---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +This node describes a TPM device connected to Processor on i2c bus.
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +
> >> +- compatible : 'manufacturer,model'
> >> +- label : represents device type
> >> +- linux,sml-base : base address of the Event Log. It is a physical
> >address.
> >> +             sml stands for shared memory log.
> >> +- linux,sml-size : size of the memory allocated for the Event Log.
> >> +
> >> +Optional properties:
> >> +
> >> +- status: indicates whether the device is enabled or disabled.
> >"okay" for
> >> +          enabled and "disabled" for disabled.
> >> +
> >> +Example
> >> +-------
> >> +
> >> +tpm@57 {
> >> +  reg = <0x57>;
> >> +  label = "tpm";
> >> +  compatible = "nuvoton,npct650", "nuvoton,npct601";
> >> +  linux,sml-base = <0x7f 0xfd450000>;
> >> +  linux,sml-size = <0x10000>;
> >> +  status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >
> >I would rather name the fields event-log-base and event-log-size. They
> >would be much more readable and obvious names.
> 
> I agree - I always get stuck upon the sml thing.
> >
> >Also, enabled should be "enabled", not "okay".
> 
> No!
> okay/ok is a dt keyword! (Or at least used in everything else)
> 
> It has nothing to do whether the TPM is enabled/disabled/activated whatever
> Peter

OK, just to educate myself, where can I find these standard keywords?

The granularity is wrong (section 8.7 of TPM 2.0 Structures
specification). There are four different things that you can
enabled/disable.

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to