On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 23:10 +0530, Nayna wrote: > On 06/07/2016 12:27 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking into running a TPM microconference at the Linux > > Plubmers > > Conference in Santa Fe the first week of November. Right now we > > have a > > bunch of individual pieces of TPM-related technology, but little > > overall > > coherence - almost nobody ships working TPM-enabled bootloaders, we > > have > > no known-good PCR values available, distributions are unclear on > > what > > the appropriate TPM 2.0 userlands to ship are, we don't even have a > > spec > > for how PCRs should be used under Linux. > > > > If this seems like it'd be useful, please add your name to > > http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2016:tpms along with any > > additional > > topics you'd like to discuss - and if you'd like to lead a short > > discussion session, drop me an email with a description. > > One topic I would like to suggest for the discussion is > "Standardization of Device Tree Bindings for TPM".
This has been accepted by Plumbers now, so the way you submit topics for discussion is via the website: https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2016/ocw/events/LPC2016/proposals James > Currently, TCG Specs also do not have information on Device Tree > based mechanisms either for TPM 1.2 or TPM 2.0. > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Thanks & Regards, > - Nayna > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > _______________________________________________ > tpmdd-devel mailing list > tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
