On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:30:40AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote: > Virtual TPM, which is being used on IBM POWER7+ and POWER8 systems running > POWERVM, is currently supported by tpm device driver but lacks the > documentation. This patch adds the missing documentation for the existing > support. > > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > Changelog v2: > > - New Patch > > .../devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/ibmvtpm.txt | 41 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/ibmvtpm.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/ibmvtpm.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/ibmvtpm.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d89f999 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/ibmvtpm.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +* Device Tree Bindings for IBM Virtual Trusted Platform Module(vtpm) > + > +Required properties: > + > +- compatible : property name that conveys the platform > architecture > + identifiers, as 'IBM,vtpm' > +- device_type : specifies type of virtual device
A generic device tree question. What is the difference between these fields? Why the I2C one does have 'device_type'? /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
