On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 10:49:32AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 03:41:17PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > -   bin_file =
> > +   chip->bios_dir[cnt] =
> >         securityfs_create_file("binary_bios_measurements",
> > -                              S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, tpm_dir,
> > +                              S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, chip->bios_dir[cnt],
> 
> That is certainly not right, Nayna's version was correct, the function
> argument is the directory to create under and bios_dir[0] is setup as the
> directory for tpm. This is also why removal is done in reverse order,
> files are removed then the directory that contains them.

Right. I overlooked this.

> Jason

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to