On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 10:39:31AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> In tpm_del_char_device device_del is called
> prior to tpm2_shutdown where it is still used.
> 
> Fortunately, so far chip->dev was used only for printouts
> int tpm2_shutdown flow, hence system didn't crash. But with
> the introduction of runtime power management it will result in
> shutting down the parent device while it still in use.
> 
> Fixes: 20e0152393b41 ("tpm: fix crash in tpm_tis deinitialization")
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>

Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index e5950131bd90..b1cb0aae8e66 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
>       cdev_del(&chip->cdev);
> -     device_del(&chip->dev);
>  
>       /* Make the chip unavailable. */
>       mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> @@ -274,6 +273,8 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>               tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
>       chip->ops = NULL;
>       up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> +
> +     device_del(&chip->dev);
>  }
>  
>  static int tpm1_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to