On 1/3/2017 4:47 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I think we should also consider TPM 1.2 support in all of this, it is > still a very popular peice of hardware and it is equally able to > support a RM.
I suspect that TPM 2.0 is different enough from 1.2 that there may be little common code. My immediate need is for 2.0, since 1.2 does have tcsd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
