Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote on 01/03/2017
07:42:17 PM:
> > ... but my current TPM doesn't understand
> > anything other than sha1 or sha256, so it wouldn't allow more state of
> > the art algorithms like sha224, sha384 or sha512 either.
>
> Okay, yes, that is horrible :( If it is that bad it might not be worth
> the effort.
The place to ask for new algorithms is the TCG's Device Driver WG. It's
an odd WG name, but this is the WG where the TPM mandatory algorithms are
specified.
A real, commercial use case will likely be an effective argument, since
these are resource constrained and cost sensitive.
SHA-384 and SHA-512 are currently optional, which traditionally means
they won't be implemented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
