On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 19:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:14:13AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -199,7 +227,9 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device
> > > *pdev,
> > >   return chip;
> > >  
> > >  out:
> > > + put_device(&chip->devrm);
> > >   put_device(&chip->dev);
> > > + put_device(&chip->devrm);
> > >   return ERR_PTR(rc);
> > >  }
> > 
> > Something has gone wrong here..
> 
> Not a big surprise. There were a bunch of these small patches
> that I had to squash. Thanks for spotting this.
> 
> Funny that I didn't experiece any issues when I run my smoke
> tests.

It's the error path in tpm_chip_alloc: it's incredibly hard to trigger,
which is probably why your tests didn't see it.  You basically either
have to be out of kernel memory or out of TPM device numbers.

James



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to