On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:37:12AM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> According to the comments, adding/removing the chip from the list should be
> the first/last action in (un)register. But currently it is done in a
> subfunction in the middle of the process. Moving the code from the
> subfunctions to the appropriate places within (un)register ensures that the
> code matches the comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <alexander.stef...@infineon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 67ec9d3..a353b7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -327,11 +327,6 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     /* Make the chip available. */
> -     mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> -     idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, chip, chip->dev_num);
> -     mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
> -
>       return rc;
>  }
>  
> @@ -339,11 +334,6 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
>       cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
>  
> -     /* Make the chip unavailable. */
> -     mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> -     idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, NULL, chip->dev_num);
> -     mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
> -
>       /* Make the driver uncallable. */
>       down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
>       if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> @@ -438,6 +428,11 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>               return rc;
>       }
>  
> +     /* Make the chip available. */
> +     mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> +     idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, chip, chip->dev_num);
> +     mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_register);
> @@ -457,6 +452,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_register);
>   */
>  void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
> +     /* Make the chip unavailable. */
> +     mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> +     idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, NULL, chip->dev_num);
> +     mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
> +
>       tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip);
>       tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
>       if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> -- 

This is unnecessary and questionable code shuffling in a very critical
places of the driver code where race conditions are easily introduced.

If you don't have a better reason to do this, I'm not going to take
this. I also fail to see the connection to the patch set as whole.

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to