Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > cmlenz has discussed this before, and it is similar to the plan for > handling site files with setuptools.
Can you possibly point me to this resource? > Hopefully we can actually take > it one step further and do arbitrary chains of these (very helpful to > create multiple classes of environments). If I've understood you right, that's the goal what I have, but independently of setuptools. This needs just a few tiny changes to the existent code-base (this one discussed in this topic beeing the first one). > On the other hand, for what > you are talking about I don't think it much matters. If someone is > trying to run two versions of a webapp, they should be ready to get > their hands dirty. > Currently it just means doing the installs with different prefixes, which > isn't that hard. I make 'my hands dirty' in order to prevent users from making their hands dirty. nothing special. - http://dev.lazaridis.com/base/ticket/43 . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
