-On [20061022 14:12], Luis Matos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Dom, 2006-10-22 às 10:09 +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai escreveu: >> -On [20061019 11:43], Luis Matos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >It is easier to have a full trac.ini, or some other file, that would be >> >easy to setup, again, as a config file, it should be in /etc/trac. >> >> Placing third-party configuration files in /etc is a Linuxism. Please don't >> impose platform-specific stuff on the rest of us not using Linux. :) >> >Please do not transform this in a linux vs Whatever flame...
I am not, note the smiley at the end. I am merely pointing out the futility of hard-coding /etc, it works for the majority of Linux systems, but Trac isn't solely run on Linux. So the solution needs to keep in mind that it has to work on a variety of systems, even including Windows. In general 'should' is on par with must/to be obliged, in other words a non-negotiable thing. I also didn't say I disagreed with the idea of inheritance. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ Seize from every moment its unique novelty and do not prepare your joys... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
