So one time operation - creation of the personal account (login, password, control field) was decided to be serious detriment? Worse than what we have now - that it is close to impossible to file a ticket or comment? Well, I'm sorry then.
So in this case it there a way to administer the installation (or add a hack) to provide different rights to "any valid user" than to the "anonymous"? I'd write a wrapper to add accounts then :( > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Noah Kantrowitz > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: НА: [Trac-dev] Please Verify, unable to post > anything to trac.edgewall.org > > > > > Sergey Chernov (m) wrote: > > Better add accounts to any user - no anonymous postings; use picture > recognition or like to create personal account > > CAPTCHAs have been discussed many times before, and each time the > consensus was that the detriment to usability was worse than the false > positives. A single guest account on trac.edgewall.org might help to > stem the tide, but it isn't a "good" solution by any means. I forget who > suggested it, but someone mentioned in #trac that they just hacked the > newticket template to have a "What is 2+2?" field, and that was enough > to stop a lot of bots (for now). > > --Noah > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Trac Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac- > dev > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
