Hi all, I'm silently participating in this group, and during the last few weeks I was wondering why there was a new name that occurred to me much more often than the rest of the names of the team that I happen to know. Is it just me (and, perhaps, the GoogleGroups "profile" function) believing that somebody has a habit of trying to "take over" opensource development?
As far as I'm concerned, the trac team does a good job (if you can speak of a "job" regarding some free, donated piece of work) designing and implementing something that's awfully useful for my daily business. While I'm pretty aware that following something known as "best practice" and "defined process" will help projects to eventually succeed, I happen to work a lot with people that care more about the "how" than the "what". Pesonally, I tend to dislike that, and I'm happy to see a more pragmatic approach here. And I'd like it to stay that way. Ilias (may I call you by your first name?), you have this web page about a trac audit. http://case.la[xxx].com/wiki/TracAudit May I ask who asked you to do a audit at all, why this audit or its outcomings should influence the trac development and why it's you setting up rules that others should follow? Kind regards, Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
