Am 11.02.2007 um 11:26 schrieb Christian Boos: > Matt Good wrote: >> However, if the namespace stuff is still controversial we could put >> that aside temporarilly, but I'd like to see the setuptools stuff >> merged soon[1]. So, are there any other issues that need resolved >> before this is merged? > > As long as the setuptools changes are easy to merge in other branches > (i.e. they don't involve any moving of files around), I'm OK for the > setuptools related enhancements to go in trunk.
So that's a "no", as you *know* that integrating the setuptools stuff will require moving files around. What "other branches" are we talking about anyway? I've lost track, you seem to have merged half of the security branch already, and your other branches are already in too AFAICT, or am I missing something that would be horribly affected by the setuptools integration? Cheers, Chris -- Christopher Lenz cmlenz at gmx.de http://www.cmlenz.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
