2007/10/23, Jani Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Is there be some drawbacks/compatibility problems that prevents using > >> it? Or does it just need someone to write such a backend plugin that > >> uses pySVN? > > > > The latter, as far as I know. > > Well, sounds like nice excercise to get back on Trac... :)
There is 'pysvn-plugin' I wrote before. But I gave up that way... So it is not well maintained. Thre reason I stopped is that PySVN (at least, the version of pysvn on that time) only have a WC level + alpha APIs and it does not provide small / low-level operations (unlike Subversion FS and RA API does). So I implemted with middle size of functions of PySVN to get small information required for Trac VC API. As result, it was slow. # That is the reason I'd started trying to use RA layer of swig python # binding. Here's a my old code. http://www.meadowy.org/~gotoh/projects/pysvn-plugin It may help if you want to play or implementing: I've forgot the implementation level of this code... sorry. And also, RA version is here: http://www.meadowy.org/~gotoh/projects/remote-svn-plugin RA version is not yet completed, but it would work, I beleve. -- Shun-ichi GOTO --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
