Hi, I had a cursory look, and I think it'd make for an interesting plugin if somebody is interested, but it's not really a good fit for core inclusion.
Like all things of this nature, it seems to me to be only as useful as the number of applications that include support for it. Alec On 3/3/08, Erling Wegger Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > If you think that creating a common ontology that are compatible with > the most popular Bug Trackers would be a good idea I would like to > encourage you to take a look at http://code.google.com/p/baetle/ - and > join the discussion at the mailing list. > > I think this could be great for interoperability and integration! It > could make it easier for users of other Bug Trackers to adopt Trac in > the future. > > I hope it is okay to post this on this list, I really think that the > people that develop Trac should know about Baetle. > > - Erling > > > > -- Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
