Jonas Borgström wrote: > Christian Boos wrote: > >> Hi Jonas, >> >> It seems I don't have the write permission there. >> Please add it for me and others. >> > > It should work now.
Yes it does, thanks! > I also initialized merge tracking. > Well, from the lesson learnt during 0.10-stable maintenance, I can say that using svnmerge for tracking to merges from trunk to stable quickly becomes unusable, as there's too much manual maintenance to do for the "blocked" changes and the situation, while manageable at the beginning, only worsen over time, as more and more changes need to be blocked. However, it could eventually work if the merges are done in the other direction (from stable to trunk), as bug fixes should usually also apply to trunk. For example, this is what the Mercurial project does, they have an hg-stable branch where they do the bug fixes, and that branch regularly gets merged into the default branch (the development branch for the next version). This minimizes the merge tracking maintenance. >> Also, you could take this opportunity to kill the old developer-specific >> branches (cboos-dev, cmlenz-dev, etc.). Christopher was OK with that. >> > > Yes, will do. Thanks! The browser quickjump list looks better now ;-) -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
