On Saturday 03 May 2008 04:47:53 am Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > My current suggestion: > > beta 1 : 2008-10-01 > beta 2 : 2008-10-14 > rc1 : 2008-11-01 > rc2 : 2008-11-14 (as needed) > release: 2008-12-01 > > And a suggestion aside from the above: > > 2008-[06/07/08/09]-01 we will use for creating tech previews (which we will > update t.e.o. with) for showcasing the current state of Trac. > > My main reason for being a bit 'strict' on the dates is that it would give > us early feedback of trunk's behaviour on large datasets and tackle any > blocker issues like the memory problem early on.
Assuming a 0.11 release at the end of the May, this is a 6 month schedule; seems reasonable to me. I like John's suggestion of picking 2 features for a release. I think that if we get those 2 features in, and stable, we should start the beta-to-release process then, even if it's early. I'd also like to see us improve our testing; Tim has been doing a lot of work with VM buildbots, but we could use more machines if people have one to spare. And our test coverage leaves a great deal to be desired. Eli ------------------. "If it ain't broke now, Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram [EMAIL PROTECTED] `------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
