Hi,
At some point in the past, some lead developer wrote that tickets that were created w/ an attached patch may contain the [PATCH] keyword in the summary, while existent tickets that were attached a patch after their creation should not be renamed.IMHO this rule should be kept, as it makes ticket history easier to follow w/ email clients for instance.
I renamed two tickets like you described above. I didn't know about this policy, so I'm sorry if this wasn't adequate. How do you mark a ticket as having a patch for review?
-- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
