Trac hacks are not so critical for me to sacrifice convenience for reliability or ideological independence. Although I am interested in trac-hacks ML discussions, I won't subscribe to it just to read the stuff or participate in occasional discussion. I have a lot of other stuff to do. I am pretty sure the list won't lose anything either, but I would appreciate a Google Groups mirror interface as more convenient alternative to Gmane or Nabble.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[email protected]> wrote: > > -On [20090317 05:21], Chris Mulligan ([email protected]) wrote: >>I'm not a contributor, but I agree. The two existing lists are on >>google and it's nice to have a reliable, independent list. > > With all due respect for Google and their efforts, reliable is not a word I > would use for Google Groups at times. > > Personally I'm perfectly fine with a mailing list separate from Google. > > -- > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai > イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン > http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B > Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds. > The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly > submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his > intelligence... > > > > -- --anatoly t. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
