On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Noah Kantrowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Remy Blank
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:25 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: making form-based auth the default?
>>
>> John Hampton wrote:
>> > I'd like to hear the opinion of others on this point.  SessionStore
>> or
>> > htpasswd file as the default password store for new environments
>>
>> I have no strong preference for either one, but I also think that using
>> the same authentication store for Trac and other systems is the
>> exception rather than the norm. And most other systems I have used
>> (admittedly not many) store user credentials in their database.
>>
>> So +0 for SessionStore from me.
>
> I would buy that if not for the primary exception of Trac on Apache +
> mod_dav_svn. And that's a pretty common case.

I'm +0 for htpasswd for this very reason.  Personally I prefer to use
a DB-based password store for my Trac servers, and to support SVN auth
I wrote a simple mod_python auth handler that connects to said
database.  Works for me, but not for everyone.  I suppose one could
contribute an Apache module in C for using Trac auth, but I doubt
anyone wants to support that.  Otherwise, I'm not sure of a way other
than htpasswd that would be widely supported.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to