Emmanuel Blot wrote:
> It seems t.e.o. is in trouble:
>
> eb...@oulme:~$ ping trac.edgewall.org
> PING www.edgewall.org (88.198.140.129): 56 data bytes
> ^C
> --- www.edgewall.org ping statistics ---
> 23 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> ...
>   

Yes, it's not the first time. Besides Jonas, Christopher has also access 
on t.e.o, and the other day he was able to verify that the issue was due 
to an excessive number of IDLE in transaction connections (#8443).

This is eventually fixable, but this raises the more general question of 
t.e.o.'s maintenance. Both Jonas and Christopher are not very active 
lately, and Christopher suggested that the "Trac community" should 
eventually takes over the maintenance of Trac's Trac, in the spirit of 
the recent Trac-Hacks move. I'm not sure he was referring to t.e.o 
alone, or the whole of edgewall.org, or even if a domain change was in 
order. In any case, a more responsive hosting for Trac could certainly 
help. So while waiting for the return of Jonas, we should eventually be 
ready to propose alternatives to him, and then let him decide on the 
further steps to take.

I personally can't offer any hosting solution, but I'd be interested to 
have at least some access to the future server, in order to help 
troubleshoot whatever problem might come up.

-- Christian


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to