Christian Boos wrote: > So unless things have improved on the Bitten side, I'm a bit reluctant > to reactivate it, in particular in days of heavy activity ;-)
I understand. It's pretty clear that Bitten generates lots of DB activity, especially with ~10 build slaves polling for builds regularly (currently every 5 minutes). This would explain #8602, but for the other one, it's probably a bug in Bitten itself. OTOH, I was hoping that the experience gained on t.e.o could somehow flow back into Bitten and make it more efficient. One thing we could already do to lighten the load on t.e.o is to avoid running too many builds in parallel. Currently, all configurations are built independently, hence in parallel. I could change my scripts so that at most one build is active at any time (per platform). This should avoid the peak of activity at every commit. The thing is, Bitten really is incredibly useful. > Windows 7 anyone? ;-) Not yet, but I plan to buy a new laptop, so I should have a license pretty soon. -- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
