On 7/7/10 12:18 PM, Terje S. wrote: <mucho grande snippo>
I only intended to provoke serious consideration of the approach to data modelling, and I did it *only* because you guys asked for it, not because I was prepared to fork the codebase or create a new product from scrach to prove that relational systems really do serve a purpose. I thought it would be nice to offer my help on the specific issue along with the criticism too, but as Noah accurately predicted, "Trac-proper" is indeed not very interested unless it's incremental code.
I'm piping up late here. I am interested in your ideas. I agree with Noah, and I think yourself as well, that before it's really considered for inclusion in "core" it need be proved in a branch first.
I am willing to help you work on said branch (we'll use github), though I can't promise lots of time. As anyone can attest to here, I haven't been active as of late.
And so, I guess we leave it at that to save banddwidth on all layers. Thanks everyone for your time, I have gathered the information I was looking for. I am sad that noone spoke up in favour, and will now stop beating the topic further to death. Let me know if any modelling work is needed.
Let me know off-list if you're interested in pursuing your ideas further. -John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
