On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Remy Blank <remy.bl...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Itamar O wrote: > (snip) > > Unfortunately, it's going to be a bit more complicated than that. Since > the authz checking is now a permission policy, it can be used for any > repository type. And we don't have a "generic" way yet to get the scope > of a repository (or, alternatively, to get the full path from the "Trac > path"), so we will need to add that. > The AuthzSourcePolicy is supposed to be used for other-than-SVN repositories? If so, then putting it under versioncontrol.svn_authz seems somewhat confusing... In addition, the "scope" property exists in versioncontrol.api, so I assumed it is available for all supported types. Isn't it the case? If not, then there's indeed a need for a generic way to get the full vcs-path, as you said. > > Please do open a ticket about this, and add your thoughts about the > solution, and we will build on that. There's another issue with authz > already (#9542), so I'll be working on it shortly. > done in http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9566 > > Thanks for the heads-up! > > -- Remy > > Thanks for the quick response! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
