On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Christian Boos wrote:
However I still think that separating the open source projects from the companies using private Tracs would be useful. In the first section "open
Well, the "instead" only referred to the "I work at" comment. I agree that commercial and open accessable stuff should be separated.
source", we're free to organize it as we want, placing the outstanding Tracs first (including those of contributors to the projects if they want, starting with edgewall.org itself). Whereas in the second section for companies, a neutral order sounds more appropriate (e.g. last additions at the end as it is now I believe - easier to maintain than alphabetical order).
Well, it is harder to read for the user, so alphabetical is much better.
From time to time someone can have a look and resort :-)
Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
