On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Ethan Jucovy wrote:
The purpose of this vote is to collect Trac community sentiments about a fork,
and about whether we would like the Apache-licensed Bloodhound project to start
from a fork of Trac. The alternative would
be for the Apache-licensed Bloodhound project to start with a dependency on the
Trac core, and to consist of Apache-licensed plugins and/or installers.
Please vote +1 (in favor of fork), -1 (against a fork) , +0 (no strong opinion
but would rather see a fork) or -0 (no strong opinion but would rather not see
a fork) if you are interested. I will
reference the results of this thread in an email to the Apache Incubator list.
-1 (against a fork)
But the trac core based plugin/installer development variant sounds very
positive to me and with close cooperation core patches can produce
necessary interfaces when required.
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
