Peter Suter wrote: > Sure. (Cheating a bit with #10594 but I really think it makes sense to > close it.)
The post-commit script isn't a release blocker anyway, as we can provide it through other channels if needed. Feel free to file a new ticket about it already now, so that we don't forget. Of course, if someone wants to contribute a script now, to be included in 1.0, even better. > "My" ticket here is "Add support for date type in custom ticket fields". > http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/1942 > > I think the patches are good enough to be applied as they are. I could > probably do that before the release. > > But since the patches are kind of large, we could also wait until after > the release, in case anyone wants to review, test or improve the patches > some more. I hesitated for a long time with #1942. As Christian mentioned, current trunk is very stable and has been for a long time. The patches in #1942 are sufficiently large and invasive that I'm not confident that they won't affect this stability. I would rather apply them shortly after the release, early in the development cycle, so that they get some exposure on trunk and any issues get ironed out. -- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
