Remy Blank <remy.bl...@pobox.com> writes: > Greg Troxel wrote: >> Do you mean >> >> A) This software PyCharm has been licensed under an open-source license? >> >> or >> >> B) This software PyCharm is proprietary, but no-cost proprietary > licenses >> are available to people working on open-source projects? >> >> If B, please don't say "open-source license for PyCharm". > > The latter. The exact terms are "PyCharm License Agreement for Open > Source Project Development": > > http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/buy/license_opensource.html > > I was missing the word "development" between "open-source" and > "license". You didn't expect JetBrains to give out the source code for > their products so easily, did you?
No, I don't. But I also find it puzzling that free software development is willing to use proprietary software, especially after the bitkeeper kerfluffle.
pgp1CKG5vJa7k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
