-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27.03.2013 02:24, RjOllos wrote: > On Monday, March 25, 2013 5:19:26 AM UTC-7, Chris Nelson wrote: > > I'm asking for your opinions here. > > > > Do you feel, that new time fields should in general use the new POSIX > > microseconds format, or is it ok to use seconds, if the extra > precision > > doesn't matter, i.e. no change tracking like done for ticket > changes? If > > I understood correctly, this was the main reason behind the move to > > microseconds for Trac time field. > > ... > > There's no harm in having a bunch of 0s at the end of your time stamp > if all you need is second resolution but there is lot to be gained > from consistent format. I'd vote for all microseconds. > > > What Chris says makes sense to me, so I'd also suggest going with > microseconds unless the Trac devs suggest differently.
Thanks, already going that direction. Steffen Hoffmann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFSpdsACgkQ31DJeiZFuHd5twCfXYybKLR9eJvO69XXzcK2Q60J NOoAoISdL6d+uBuXXdSU+L/kWKQDnHFh =n1Al -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to trac-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to trac-dev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
