> I've completed a fair chunk of these changes. A summary of what is done > and what is pending is available at: > > http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/WorkFlow > > I've also documented the available field options.
The query unit tests are failing because the generated SQL depends on the order in which fields are encountered. As they are now encountered in the order they are to be displayed, this results in different SQL. Question is, is this an issue? The query code arbitrarily truncates the columns to to 7, which is currently dropping the "owner" field, plus others. It seems that this doesn't matter however as the owner column is not displayed. Is this correct? If so, I'll just modify the unit tests accordingly. On a related note, because the fields have changed order, this also changes the order in which query constraints appear on the query page. -- Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves. _______________________________________________ Trac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev
