On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:49 +0100, Christian Boos wrote: > Christopher Lenz wrote: > > trac.util is becoming a dropbox for all sorts of (more or less) > > reusable code. Before its size gets out of hand, I'd like to make it a > > package (instead of a module), and split off some functionality (such > > as the date formatting or the Markup class) into separate modules > > inside that package. > > > > What do you think?
Yeah, I've been feeling the same way. > Ok, now I'll try to "categorize" all the symbols we have in util.py: > > => algo (frozenset, reversed, sorted, embedded_numbers) The first 3 are compatibility methods for emulating Python 2.4 built-ins, so I would prefer a separate "compat" package so it's easier to find and remove these methods when they're no longer needed. > => trac (TracError) "trac.util.trac" wouldn't make a good package name if that's what you're indicating here. -- Matthew Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Trac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev
