Christopher Lenz wrote: > Am 16.03.2006 um 10:47 schrieb Christian Boos: >> Christopher Lenz wrote: >>> Am 16.03.2006 um 10:02 schrieb Christian Boos: [...] >>> >>> The MySQL patch is looking pretty good, even though IIUC it only >>> supports MySQL >= 4.1. >> >> Sure, but what remains to be merged? I thought the patch has been >> merged already. >> Support for MySQL 4.0 can still be done later (0.11). > > The MySQL connector hasn't been merged yet. And yes, support 4.0 can be > delayed (personally, I couldn't care less about 4.0 ;-) ) >
I'm betting mysql4.0 will be largely irrelevant by the time we get around to 0.11. I just started playing around w/ 4.1, and for the most part it works (I found a rather pleasant bug related to concatentation w/ || that's fixed in 5.0). However, before I go much futher, I intend to put together a patch that deals w/ unit testing on alternate databases. My testing methods thus far has literally been to update a company instance of trac, and let my coworkers hammer on it a bit. I'd like something a bit more structured, as well as a nice way to tell if I'm breaking postgresql or sqlite in the process. I should have that wrapped up before the end of the week, and I hope I can get it committed before the mysql connector stuff. _______________________________________________ Trac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev
