> w/ || that's fixed in 5.0).  However, before I go much futher, I intend
> to put together a patch that deals w/ unit testing on alternate
> databases.  My testing methods thus far has literally been to update a
> company instance of trac, and let my coworkers hammer on it a bit.  I'd
> like something a bit more structured, as well as a nice way to tell if
> I'm breaking postgresql or sqlite in the process.  I should have that

That sounds seriously good! Great stuff.

Regards,

Manuzhai
_______________________________________________
Trac-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-dev

Reply via email to