#3416: IFrame
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  anonymous  |        Owner:  cmlenz  
     Type:  defect     |       Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal     |    Milestone:  0.10    
Component:  wiki       |      Version:  0.9.6   
 Severity:  normal     |   Resolution:          
 Keywords:             |  
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by eblot):

 > Well, we don't produce XHTML 1.1, so using <iframe> should be perfectly
 legal. We're probably being too paranoid there.

 We need to check that <iframe> is legal for 1.0 STRICT, I'm not sure it is
 (I did not find the info from the official w3c web site). It is illegal
 with XHTML 1.1 *, but I'm not sure it is even legal in 1.0 STRICT (i.e.
 perhaps it is only legal in XHTML 1.0 transitional, which we do not
 support).

 Moreover, <iframe> is "officially" not recommended (I need to find the
 reference...) because it is known to cause several issues with several
 well known browsers, so I'm not sure it is worth adding it to Trac.

 I'll try to find some official references about the above point. [[BR]]
 (as a side note: I can't quote your comment, the Safari+"ticket reply" bug
 is back)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3416>
The Trac Project <http://trac.edgewall.com/>
_______________________________________________
Trac-Tickets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-tickets

Reply via email to