I vote for removing the tag from the header also. There is no need for it.
I believe the perception is that having [Trac] in subject of the email allows for email filtering. However, this is very bad way to filter out emails you want from emails you don't want (e.g. spam). Anybody with an email client can send an email with [Trac] in the subject line, and the email filter would then consider the email to be non-spam. This is obviously not what is required. If anybody wants to filter out emails from this distribution, so that they don't get handled as spam emails, then they MUST check the sender email address to see if is is [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is therefore no need to check the subject line of the email for any special text such as [Trac]. Thanks, Tim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jürgen Urner Sent: 01 September 2006 23:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Trac] Re: Admins: Please add [TRAC] to subject Pedro Algarvio, aka, s0undt3ch schrieb: > I vote for removing [TRAC] or [Trac] the list-id header is enough, but > I guess the decision has been made. > Is ther a voting on that? If there where one, I'd second that. [TRAC] in a trac mailing list is a mere tautology. Maybe s.o. could explain to me what it's even good for? Juergen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
