Dirk wrote: > Noah Kantrowitz wrote: >>> Hrm, "everything"? Currently the BuildBot plugin is just a skeleton >>> and doesn't offer any functionality yet. Of course BuildBot itself is >>> well established, but if you want to integrate it with Trac you'll >>> need >>> to do it yourself. >> On the other hand Bitten is very well integrated with Trac, but has >> less support on the build side ;-) > > I knew it couldn't be that easy. :) > > Can anybody give me a hint about activity on both of these projects? It > looks like BuildBot got a code drop in April and nothing after that, > while bitten was a diploma thesis and a Google SoC project, both of > which are over now. Doesn't look good for either, but at least bitten > has a bunch of open tickets. ;) Is there something going on behind the > scenes that's not immediately visible?
Well, in my experience, bitten is actively maintained. We use bitten at <http://linadd.org> (have a look at the Build Status button). If you want build configuration examples to get you started, let me know (we mostly use the infamous ./configure + make + make install combo. Whenever we've had problems, we got the answer or solution from the author within a day or a few days. > Is anybody but the initial developers using either one of those? How > successfully? Bitten works very nicely, we've used it for about six months now. There are integration points with test cases that we haven't started using yet, so I couldn't tell you about that, but for the builds it works just great. IMHO it's the best choice for Trac integrated build system. /[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
