On Sep 7, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:

> Lately my server seems to be a bit slower that normal, so I am toying
> with some tuning knobs. I am using mod_python on Apache 2.0 (FCGI  
> isn't
> really an option as I am using a mod_python authn handler). I  
> currently
> have Apache compiled with mpm_worker with the following tuning  
> directives:
>      ThreadLimit 100
>      StartServers         2
>      MaxClients         150
>      MinSpareThreads     25
>      MaxSpareThreads     75
>      ThreadsPerChild    75
>      MaxRequestsPerChild  10000
>
> Right after a server restart things seem back to their previous zippy
> speed (I was actually using mpm_prefork prior to this tuning frenzy),
> but after a dozen or two requests it slows to the point of being
> unusable. The only signs of this that I have found is that in the log
> for the Trac I am accessing I see lots of duplicated messages. With  
> some
> poking I found that on the first request all messages are doubled, on
> the second request all messages are tripled, and so on. Has anyone  
> seen
> this before? And if so it fixable? Alternatively does anyone else  
> have a
> well tuned setup for mod_python+Trac+SVN DAV?

We have the opposite problem, which is that our mod_python + Trac +  
SVN DAV setup (Mac OS X 10.4) is slow when starting after a few hours  
of non-use, but after a bit of usage, gets fast. This sounds just like  
things are being slowly paged in, but there's lots of unused memory on  
this server.

Has anyone else had and solved this kind of performance problem?

Cheers!
--Chris Ryland / Em Software, Inc. / www.emsoftware.com



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to