This neither removes nor changes any existing functionality, and so is hard to see that anyone would object to it. I list the 'Trac' tag in the title of each page, and would argue against its removal. One is also a functional issue that breaks an existing convention, the other is purely aesthetic.
--Noah On Sep 16, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > > Christian Boos wrote: >> Norbert Unterberg wrote: >>> 2006/9/14, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> The syntax would be [#Title1 See section 1], as this would work >>>> anywhere, not only on Wiki pages. >>>> >>>> This change has no adverse effects, AFAICT. >>> >>> Does that mean you could add that patch to trunk and the upcoming >>> 0.10? It would be nice if it could be included in the latest >>> versions. >> >> We try to be conservative about new features close to a release. >> But in >> this case, one must really try hard to see that change as a >> disruptive >> one ;) >> So yes. > > The functional addition discussed here (sidenote: I welcome this > addition) is non-disruptive, and _can_ go into 0.10.. > > But: The following ticket discusses a defect within the html > presentation and _cannot_ go into 0.10, even if it is totally > non-disruptive. I was even asked to not file tickets for 0.10: > > http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3730 > > Is there any reason for this "selective ruling"? > > . > > -- > http://lazaridis.com > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
