On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:57 AM, Sell, Christian (external) wrote:
> > The discussion following issue #493 (which is 2 years old BTW) > mentions > pysvn as a possible solution, but no one seems to have tackled this. > > It seems strange to me that the access layer to svn, which itself > is all > about remoteness, would not support remote repository access. And yes, > hopefully the trac code is layered such that dropping in something > like > pysvn is easy - although the 2 years this issue has been pending > speak a > different language. "Feel free" ;-) All that needs to be added is a new subclass of Repository. > > I personally would prefer pysvn, because it would not require an > update of > the svn server or client to 1.4. > > BTW, I tried the suggested workaround with SVK - but that adds another > installation orgy (perl stuff in this case) with scores of > dependencies. On > a server with no internet and no root privs this is just too much. > I am > afraid trac is not for us. svnsync is part of Subversion's base install. --Noah --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
