(I realize this is OT, and I hate to make an OT as my first post, but ... it's an answer...)
>From what I understand from the CentOS IRC channel chatter, it's not included because due to ClearSilver's config scripts not working on x86_64 without some hairy patches, from RH's point of view Trac only runs on i386 right now. RH's policy is to not support arch-specific software if they can avoid it, so having ClearSilver as a dependency knocked Trac out. As a general guidelline, if you see something in Fedora 5, it will make it into RHEL 5. If you don't see it in Fedora 5, the chances of it being in RHEL 5 are limited. -Karl Katzke http://www.karlkatzke.com On Jan 25, 7:23 pm, Matthew Gillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rjcarr wrote: > > At my work we typically use RHEL and the current release is 4. RHN > > doesn't offer trac in RHEL 4, but I think RHEL 5 is coming out soon, > > and I'm wondering if trac will be available from RHN then? > > > I know I can manually install RPMs and even use alternative package > > repositories (e.g. rpmforge) but this essentially nullifies any > > potential benefit of using RHN. > > > Anyone know the status of RHEL 5? Anyone know when trac isn't > > currently available to any RHEL?This isn't really a Trac question, it's a > > distro-support question, and > therefore it's something you should ask RedHat, since they're the ones that > decide what packages go into the "official" (supported) RHEL. > > Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
