I should make myself clear when I use my mother tongue, English.

What I mean by 'output created' is a build, and a build for me is  
strongly related to a subversion repository value - i.e a point in time.

Thanks

--
John Clayton
Development
FileWave, Switzerland
Tel : +41-71-914-3084



On 3 Jul 2007, at 15:21, John Clayton wrote:

> Yes, this is what I'm getting at too - an effective way of tieing  
> 'work done' to 'output created', in this case 'work done' is all  
> the code changes, ticket modifications, documentation, testing etc  
> and in my case 'output created' is a subversion repo number. I see  
> the repo number as being a very stable way of defining a fixed  
> point in time - and if there was a way I could easily extract 'work  
> done' between two repo numbers, I'd be 90% happy!
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> John Clayton
> Development
> FileWave, Switzerland
> Tel : +41-71-914-3084
>
>
>
> On 3 Jul 2007, at 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> this is very similar to what was discussed in [1]. In my opinion a
>> post-commit hook helps to solve the problem. But trac could do a lot
>> more if it would understand the linage of the version numbers and the
>> layout in the archive if it would deeper integrate into  
>> subversion, e.g.
>>
>> 1.) automatically tell you which bugs are still open in different  
>> branches
>> 2.) which bugs have been fixed between two different versions /  
>> revisions
>> 3.) Have a closed state "fixed in next version" and trac would  
>> fill out
>> the version the version when the milestone is closed.
>> 4.) Build a full "Release Notes" documents for all bugs in all  
>> predecors
>> of a specific version
>> 5.) As a real integration show stopper, you could have an option  
>> in the
>> svn client (e.g. tortoiseSVN) to choose from a list of possible  
>> tickets
>> during your commit for a specific branch. But this is dreaming
>>
>> A post-commit hook and some custom fields can give you parts of this.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Dirk
>>
>> [1]
>> http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev/browse_thread/thread/ 
>> 47348243d5a98954
>>
>>
>>
>> Emmanuel Blot schrieb:
>>> You can use the trac+svn commit jook scripts to tie tickets to  
>>> SVN revisions.
>>> It requires your developers use some dedicated syntax in their  
>>> commit
>>> log message, but it works smoothly.
>>>
>>> Check out the scripts in Trac /contrib.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Manu
>>>
>>> On 7/3/07, John Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> Background:
>>>> -----------
>>>> Recently we've set up Trac+SVN to replace our ageing CVS
>>>> environment. We build our products so that they have a build number
>>>> in them, and we're thinking of changing this so that the build  
>>>> number
>>>> is simply the subversion repository number (a change that I  
>>>> think is
>>>> natural and intuitive). One of the support guys came up to me today
>>>> and said 'how do I find out what the changes we're in a particular
>>>> build?'.
>>>>
>>>> I know: there are many ways to solve this particular problem - I'm
>>>> trying to find out if there is a way I can solve this using Trac.
>>>>
>>>> The Problem:
>>>> ------------
>>>> What we'd like to be able to do is somehow extract all of the  
>>>> tickets
>>>> that relate to a particular build number, or relate to a range of
>>>> build numbers. E.g. show me all the tickets that relate to build
>>>> 1190 (i.e repo number 1190).
>>>>
>>>> The requirement comes about because when we set up our systems for
>>>> testing, we need to know specifically what must be heavily  
>>>> tested in
>>>> addition to the regression tests being performed, it's also helpful
>>>> for our support staff - since they don't want to be manually
>>>> searching the Trac tickets DB to dig this information out by having
>>>> to read through each ticket to see if it relates to a particular  
>>>> build.
>>>>
>>>> My Thoughts:
>>>> ------------
>>>> There's no specific relationship between a ticket and a build -  
>>>> so I
>>>> can't just write some SQL to create a report. There is a
>>>> relationship between a Milestone and tickets of course (which is  
>>>> why
>>>> I was thinking of pulling all the tickets for a build), so I can  
>>>> get
>>>> a list of tickets related to a milestone, but the milestone  
>>>> bears no
>>>> relationship to a build - and in reality I might have multiple
>>>> milestones that relate to a single build 'goal'.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I am bending the intention of Trac too much? I believe Trac
>>>> sees the world from a 'milestone perspective' anyway.
>>>>
>>>> My Question:
>>>> ------------
>>>> Are there any plugins or other software that would provide an  
>>>> answer
>>>> to this kind of question? I've seen only the WebAdmin plugin,  
>>>> and no
>>>> others - so any pointers to things that might be let me reach my  
>>>> goal
>>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> John Clayton
>>>> Development
>>>> FileWave, Switzerland
>>>> Tel : +41-71-914-3084
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to