Chris Black wrote: > Dana V. Baldwin wrote: > >> I'm wondering if anyone can help improve my process with TRAC. >> >> Is there a better process for flagging tickets that are ready to be tested? >> >> > > A good alternative here is to use the ticket-workflow section of > trac.ini to define a new state "done" or "needstesting". You can then > make it so devels can not resolve tickets, only set them to "done", then > you (or someone w/ proper prerms) can query everything in this state and > change them to closed/resolved with a resolution of "tested" (you can > easily create custom resolutions in trac). This is what I am doing for > our trac (still in the process of testing/research), but keep in mind I > am using 0.11 and I am not sure of the status of some of these features > in 0.10.x. > Thanks Chris.
I was wondering about the workflow in .11 and if that would solve the problem. I had been waiting on the release to test it but it seems many are already using it. Perhaps it's time to switch, i just hate to have to update more than once with beta versions. Using 10.4 at present. TYVM. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
begin:vcard fn:Dana V. Baldwin n:Baldwin;Dana org:Playnet Inc.;WWIIOL - Battleground Europe adr;dom:;;1901 Central Drive Suite 400;Bedford;Texas;76021 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Producer x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.wwiionline.com version:2.1 end:vcard
