Tyrone,
Did you see my message? Please try the command
easy_install clearsilver
and let me know if that works for you. You have to install easy_install
first. Here's my notes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd
/usr/local/src
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py
Downloading
http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg
Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg
Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages
Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file
Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin
Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin
Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg
Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6
Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6
marcio
Tyrone Hed wrote:
> Jason,
> For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to
> install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not
> being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be found.
> Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if it's
> impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The
> directions are a bunch of "with this version you use this version and then
> that version has its dependencies." It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody
> admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 but
> I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all the
> problems I have mentioned.
>
> Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw in
> the towel here.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC
>>
>>
>> Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say
>> that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly
>> it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can
>> be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you
>> need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you
>> through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install,
>> in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL +
>> Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly
>> install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed
>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC
>>
>>
>> Jason,
>> Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my
>> hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:39 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, trac "easy install" (with the quotes results in 10,500 hits :),
>> so
>>> it is about 80% easy to install.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed
>>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:12 PM
>>> To: Trac Users
>>> Subject: [Trac] TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, this really explains it: EVERYBODY thinks it's impossible to
>>> install TRAC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
