Marcio, I following that link and it, again, takes me to yet another third party bit of software. So, this really just expands the problems I have. Now, I'm even farther back, hoping that the many combinations of these tools work together. This seems tailor made to frustrate users.
-----Original Message----- >From: Marcio Marchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 9, 2007 2:07 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC > > >Hy Tyrone, > > The name is Marcio, not Mario :-) > > Are you familiar with Google? If you Google for easy_install you will > find: > >http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#installing-easy-install > > It says "Download ez_setup.py ". Get it and try my steps. > > Cheers, > >marcio > >Tyrone Hed wrote: >> Mario, >> I'm game. Where do you find that easy_install? I looked in the Python >> directory and didn't see it. I looked also in the ClearSilver directory and >> also didn't see it? >> >> From where are you executing it? >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Marcio Marchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:59 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC >>> >>> >>> Tyrone, >>> >>> Did you see my message? Please try the command >>> >>> easy_install clearsilver >>> >>> and let me know if that works for you. You have to install easy_install >>> first. Here's my notes: >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd >>> /usr/local/src >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py >>> Downloading >>> http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg >>> Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg >>> Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages >>> Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file >>> Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin >>> Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin >>> >>> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg >>> Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 >>> Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 >>> >>> >>> marcio >>> >>> >>> >>> Tyrone Hed wrote: >>>> Jason, >>>> For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to >>>> install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not >>>> being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be >>>> found. >>>> Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if >>>> it's impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The >>>> directions are a bunch of "with this version you use this version and then >>>> that version has its dependencies." It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody >>>> admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 >>>> but I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all >>>> the problems I have mentioned. >>>> >>>> Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw >>>> in the towel here. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say >>>>> that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly >>>>> it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can >>>>> be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you >>>>> need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you >>>>> through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install, >>>>> in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL + >>>>> Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly >>>>> install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache. >>>>> >>>>> Jason >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jason, >>>>> Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my >>>>> hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much! >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Jason Winnebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:39 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, trac "easy install" (with the quotes results in 10,500 hits :), >>>>> so >>>>>> it is about 80% easy to install. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed >>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:12 PM >>>>>> To: Trac Users >>>>>> Subject: [Trac] TRAC "difficult install" = 2,760 Google hits >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, this really explains it: EVERYBODY thinks it's impossible to >>>>>> install TRAC. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
