Norbert Unterberg wrote: > I already found the workaround of @head#L25. I just wanted to know if > taking #L25 as a revision number instead of a line number in my sample > was a bug, since I expected it to be either an invalid link or a link > to the file's line number in HEAD. >
Using file#revision-number is a legacy Wiki syntax, I don't know when that was introduced, but probably quite early. The fact that it also works with the #Lrevision-number syntax is probably a bit buggy, yes. Anyway, that legacy syntax will probably be removed in the future release (i.e. 0.12). -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
