Hi! On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:00 PM, John Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are LDAP plugins to AccountManager that will allow tracd to > authenticate against LDAP, so that's not really a reason.
Okay, thanks. Good to know. > Other than probable performance (though tracd isn't that much of a > slouch), All right. Performance won't be that much of an issue for us, I think. > the reason I see to not use ti directly are: > > * Based on the Python HTTP server. While not necessarily a bad thing, > I bet apache/lighttpd/nginx have been pounded on more from an HTTP > perspective than the Python HTTP server. Good point. > * Can't do SSL. This is a big one if you don't want to be sending > passwords in plain text. I don't care about that. There are much more important applications around here, which are way worse from a security point of view, compared to Trac. Sending Trac/SVN passwords in our LAN unencrypted is the least of my problems :) Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
