On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 17:16 -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 07:24 -0700, Martin S. wrote:
> >> I'm not an expert for this, but I think it's now done using the class
> >> IRequestFilter.
> >> I don't know If this works also for macros or only for plugins,
> >
> > I doubt it, but I will give it a shot.
> >> but I
> >> used code like below to add a new
> >> javascript file to the header in a recent plugin of mine. Maybe there
> >> is also a 'add_link' function.
> >
> > Yes, I found the add_link method in web.chrome
> >
> > However, it seems that:
> > - chrome gets created with a fake request object in prepare_request
> > - this method invokes add_link to add all of the <head> elements
> > - render_template then resets them, and creates late_links
> > - when my macro gets executed, the formatter has the 'real' Request
> > object, which is not the one the template is filled with.
> >
> > I can't say I understand the page processing model much in 0.11, so
> > could anyone shed some light on what's going on here ?
> 
> You cannot add things to <head> in a macro, as they are rendered too  
> late in the process.

Ok, so this is a regression from 0.10  Is it intentional or accidental ?
Is it something you consider should be fixed, and I should propose a
patch for that, or is it just not meant to be done from a macro ?

>  You could do some interesting stuff with string  
> scanning and a request filter though.

Not sure what you mean by string scanning, but it sounds like you're
saying I should be able to do it with an IRequestFilter ? Maybe you mean
'string scanning in the wiki page to detect a similar syntax to macro
syntax' ?

Thomas

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to